views from our management team

Organisational Labelling

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading ... Loading ...
August 29th, 2007 by Lesley Cowley
Posted by Lesley Cowley on Aug 29th, 2007

I had two discussions yesterday which, on reflection, illustrated the difficulties of labelling organisations and the consequences of the labels that are attached to organisations. By labelling I mean the way in which people categorise or describe an organisation. Often we seem to seek a single term for describing an organisation and I think this is too limiting.

The first discussion was part of an interview with a journalist new to the industry. Describing Nominet as a not-for-profit, in that we are prevented from distributing any profits we make, didn’t capture the full picture at all. A consequence of this label is that some think we should not make any profits at all. We’ve been a commercial company right from the very start, but probably not many people would give us this label and some think that this means we should introduce differential pricing. We are also a membership organisation and a consequence of this label is that some think we should do things purely in the interests of our members, rather than all stakeholders. We’re also labelled as a service organisation and a global internet industry organisation. Its actually quite difficult to categorise Nominet with a single label. If we do so, we miss the complexity as well as many of the issues and opportunities but also people come away with expectations linked solely with that label.

The second discussion was as a Board member of another not-for-profit organisation late yesterday evening. The introduction of benchmarking was viewed as too commercial for a not-for-profit by some, with a consequence that we might miss areas for improvement. The organisation is also a charity, with a consequence that some people think we should spend our income differently.

Thankfully, common sense prevailed when benchmarking was re-labelled as a standard management tool, a single label which made it much more acceptable :o)

.co.uk research

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading ... Loading ...
August 22nd, 2007 by Phil Kingsland
Posted by Phil Kingsland on Aug 22nd, 2007

We’ve just received the results of some research we commissioned on the use of .co.uk domain names back in and they make for interesting reading.

We’ll be announcing the results in detail shortly, but I thought I’d give you a brief taster of the kind of information we have gathered.

The data supports previous research showing that UK businesses buy the .co.uk brand to promote their local presence. It further demonstrates that of those who have registered a .co.uk website a large proportion use them as their primary web site.

It’s also clear that online brand protection is also a key driver for choosing a .co.uk domain name.

We’ll be posting further details of the research in the coming weeks.

Welcome to the Nominet blog

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (3 votes, average: 4 out of 5)
Loading ... Loading ...
August 21st, 2007 by Phil Kingsland
Posted by Phil Kingsland on Aug 21st, 2007

Welcome to our blog, which we will be using to provide you with an up to date source of information and comment from the heart of Nominet.

Members of our management team will write articles on a range of topics associated with the domain name and registry services industries.

We will continue to communicate general business news through our standard channels such as nom-announce and news articles on our web site.

We encourage your comments on our articles. Comments will be moderated and filtered for spam.

The blog is supported by an RSS feed so you can keep right up to date with the latest posts.

We hope that you will find it an interesting and useful source of information, opinion and comment.